tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2941976044448685733.post8741170847452122124..comments2023-06-20T13:09:56.441+01:00Comments on Art and Artifice: Skilled in the art: legal answers to questions of authenticityMollyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13355163599192206484noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2941976044448685733.post-6800680320683476702012-08-14T11:49:56.580+01:002012-08-14T11:49:56.580+01:00True - but the court recognised that: "Expert...True - but the court recognised that: "Expert evidence is of crucial importance in this context. As Buckley J commented in Drake v Thos. Agnew & Sons Ltd [2002] EWHC 294 (QB), a judge should not presume to have an expert's "eye"."Simonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05640938223860458111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2941976044448685733.post-54173568272544412972012-08-13T11:46:52.103+01:002012-08-13T11:46:52.103+01:00The UK courts were recently quite happy to determi...The UK courts were recently quite happy to determine that a painting allegedly by the Russian artist Boris Kustodiev was probably a forgery, in <a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2012/2198.html" rel="nofollow">Avrora vs. Christie's</a>Philip Eaglenoreply@blogger.com