tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2941976044448685733.post4562455066376364925..comments2023-06-20T13:09:56.441+01:00Comments on Art and Artifice: French Court supports freedom to deny authenticity: a win for art expertsMollyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13355163599192206484noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2941976044448685733.post-17605483485491472132014-05-21T16:38:00.769+01:002014-05-21T16:38:00.769+01:00What DT said....
Please explain how the "The...What DT said....<br /><br />Please explain how the "The art expert holds the moral rights for Metzinger’s work"<br /><br />I have studied the law as it relates to art and artists in both Europe and the US, and never have I come across a case or piece of legislation that stipulates an "art expert" has the moral rights to an the work of an artist of whom they are an expert. <br /><br />I had always understood moral rights to reside only with the author/creator.<br /><br />Perhaps you mean Nikiel inherited the legal rights to manage the estate of Metzinger? <br /><br />It would be great if you could clarify this.<br /><br />Many thanks,<br /><br />Andrew Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01915570354345943694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2941976044448685733.post-76079936770597189972014-05-12T10:50:11.183+01:002014-05-12T10:50:11.183+01:00Can anyone explain how "the art expert holds ...Can anyone explain how "the art expert holds the moral rights for Metzinger’s work"? I had understood that moral rights belonged to the author and were not assignable - although I have no particular knowledge of the law on moral rights in France.DTnoreply@blogger.com